[PATCH] dix: Fix Client starvation with SmartScheduler priorities

[Keith Packard]

Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> Wouldn't smart_stop_tick be a slightly better choice as that gives us
> the time the client became idle?

Yeah, that makes more semantic sense. Of course, in reality because
those two values are within one 'tick' of each other, it shouldn't have
a great effect.

>> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com>
> Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

Do you want to send in a patch using smart_stop_tick? Or shall I update
the patch I already have?

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 810 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20140123/e836ec62/attachment.pgp>