glamor performance regression
Michel Dänzer
michel at daenzer.net
Thu Mar 13 02:24:29 PDT 2014
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 14:10 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> commit 25be6b384298a7769fedb6d9b5bdc370398c9c95
> Author: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>
> Date: Sun Jan 12 07:18:50 2014 +0800
>
> glamor: Fix a mismatched glamor_get/put_context().
>
> We don't call GL in this function any more, so we can just drop the
> get.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>
> Reviewed-by: Markus Wick <markus at selfnet.de>
This commit made glamor unusably slow with radeonsi, at least an order
of magnitude slower than before.
Eric's pending change 'glamor: Drop the set of the context to NULL at
the end of glamor ops.' fixes the performance regression with Xephyr,
but obviously doesn't help Xorg. The standalone glamor tree doesn't have
this problem, even though the corresponding context calls are balanced
there.
Eric, any ideas?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list