[RFC] [PATCH] Extend block and wakeup handling to cover writes as well

[Pierre Ossman]

On Thu, 25 Dec 2014 13:55:13 -0800,
Keith Packard wrote:

> Pierre Ossman <ossman at cendio.se> writes:
> 
> > Please see the attached patch and see if this seems like a reasonable
> > way to solve this. I thought about changing the BlockHandlerProc
> > definition, but it is exposed in application headers so it didn't seem
> > safe to touch.
> 
> I think we should just change the BlockHandlerProc definition to include
> the write data as well. Either change requires updating every place
> these functions are used anyways.
> 

How about these patches then?

Rgds
-- 
Pierre Ossman           Software Development
Cendio AB		https://cendio.com
Teknikringen 8		https://twitter.com/ThinLinc
583 30 Linköping	https://facebook.com/ThinLinc
Phone: +46-13-214600	https://plus.google.com/+CendioThinLinc

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Allow-block-handlers-to-also-track-write-availabilit.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 709 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20150123/fc9a4d22/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Extend-block-and-wakeup-handling-to-cover-writes-as-.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 32020 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20150123/fc9a4d22/attachment-0003.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20150123/fc9a4d22/attachment-0001.sig>