[PULL] glamor-next

[Michel Dänzer]

On 26.03.2015 04:14, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> writes:
> 
>> On 25.03.2015 05:21, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>>
>>> Keith Packard (13):
>> [...]
>>>       glamor: Eliminate GLAMOR_USE_SCREEN and GLAMOR_USE_PICTURE_SCREEN
>>>       glamor: Remove _nf rendering functions
>>>       glamor: Remove ddx fallback check functions
>>
>> NAK for these changes. I'll be using the *_nf functions in the radeon
>> driver soon, and I expect there might be interest for something similar
>> in the modesetting driver and/or Xwayland in the long term as well.
> 
> Can you elaborate on what you're planning on using them for?

Choosing between hardware and software rendering in the driver. In
particular for large numbers of small operations, software rendering can
still be several times faster than hardware rendering.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 173 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20150326/7e4f3be8/attachment.sig>