[PATCH 1/5] modesetting: Improve the ms_flush_drm_events() API.
Michel Dänzer
michel at daenzer.net
Wed May 27 23:53:40 PDT 2015
On 22.04.2015 09:58, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Previously, ms_flush_drm_events() returned a boolean value, and it was
> very easy to interpret the meaning incorrectly. Now, we return an
> integer value.
>
> The possible outcomes of this call are:
> - poll() raised an error (formerly TRUE, now -1 - poll's return value)
> - poll() said there are no events (formerly TRUE, now 0).
> - drmHandleEvent() raised an error (formerly FALSE, now the negative
> value returned by drmHandleEvent).
> - An event was successfully handled (formerly TRUE, now 1).
>
> The nice part is that this allows you to distinguish errors (< 0),
> nothing to do (= 0), and success (1). We no longer conflate errors
> with success.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
> ---
> hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/present.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/present.c b/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/present.c
> index 359e113..3e8e72a 100644
> --- a/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/present.c
> +++ b/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/present.c
> @@ -72,8 +72,11 @@ ms_present_get_ust_msc(RRCrtcPtr crtc, CARD64 *ust, CARD64 *msc)
>
> /*
> * Flush the DRM event queue when full; makes space for new events.
> + *
> + * Returns a negative value on error, 0 if there was nothing to process,
> + * or 1 if we handled any events.
> */
> -static Bool
> +static int
> ms_flush_drm_events(ScreenPtr screen)
> {
> ScrnInfoPtr scrn = xf86ScreenToScrn(screen);
> @@ -86,10 +89,19 @@ ms_flush_drm_events(ScreenPtr screen)
> r = poll(&p, 1, 0);
> } while (r == -1 && (errno == EINTR || errno == EAGAIN));
>
> + /* If there was an error, r will be < 0. Return that. If there was
> + * nothing to process, r == 0. Return that.
> + */
> if (r <= 0)
> - return TRUE;
> + return r;
AFAICT the only functional change of this patch is that this case of
poll() returning <= 0 is now treated as failure, whereas it was
previously treated as success. Not sure that warrants the API change,
but anyway I think it would be good to have that one-liner bugfix in a
separate change instead of buried in the API change.
> + /* Try to handle the event. If there was an error, return it. */
> + r = drmHandleEvent(ms->fd, &ms->event_context);
> + if (r < 0)
> + return r;
>
> - return drmHandleEvent(ms->fd, &ms->event_context) >= 0;
> + /* Otherwise return 1 to indicate that we handled an event. */
> + return 1;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -159,7 +171,10 @@ ms_present_queue_vblank(RRCrtcPtr crtc,
> ret = drmWaitVBlank(ms->fd, &vbl);
> if (!ret)
> break;
> - if (errno != EBUSY || !ms_flush_drm_events(screen))
> + /* If we hit EBUSY, then try to flush events. If we can't, then
> + * this is an error.
> + */
> + if (errno != EBUSY || ms_flush_drm_events(screen) <= 0)
> return BadAlloc;
> }
> DebugPresent(("\t\tmq %lld seq %u msc %llu (hw msc %u)\n",
>
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list