[PATCH xserver] glx: Allow arbitrary context attributes for direct contexts

Adam Jackson ajax at redhat.com
Fri Jul 28 21:33:43 UTC 2017


On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 09:56 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > For direct contexts, most context attributes don't require any
> > particular awareness on the part of the server. Examples include
> > GLX_ARB_create_context_no_error and GLX_ARB_context_flush_control, where
> > all of the behavior change lives in the renderer; since that's on the
> > client side for a direct context, there's no reason for the X server to
> > validate the attribute.
> > 
> > The context attributes will still be validated on the client side, and
> > we still validate attributes for indirect contexts since the server
> > implementation might need to handle them. For example, the indirect
> > code might internally use ARB_context_flush_control for all contexts, in
> > which case it would need to manually emit glFlush when the client
> > switches between two indirect contexts that didn't request the no-flush
> > attribute.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>
> 
> Does the client side even need to send the client-side attributes for
> direct contexts?

It would probably be legal for it to not? The ARB_create_context spec,
discussing why direct/indirect is a parameter not an attribute, says
"... different paths to the server may be taken for creating direct
contexts, and parsing the attribute list in the client should not be
required". One could read that to mean that creating the server-side of
a direct context needn't be exactly like creating an indirect context,
that you could send only those attributes the server needs to be aware
of (although doing this would mean parsing the attribute list in the
client, which the issue is otherwise trying to avoid...)

However, none of the GLX extensions that define new context attributes
seem to define whether that attrib is client or server state, and
Mesa's glXCreateContextAttribsARB does not edit the attribute list
before sending it to the server. It seems simpler to me for the server
ignore unknown attribs for direct contexts than for Mesa to grow a list
of attributes to censor, because e.g. ARB_create_context_no_error would
then be exactly as easy to wire up for direct GLX as for EGL.

- ajax


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list