X SECURITY: allowed extensions for untrusted clients

[Keith Packard]

"Uecker, Martin" <Martin.Uecker at med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:

> The question is what security risks all the different extensions
> may expose.

For things like Render and Present, they're no more serious than the
existing core protocol. I'm pretty sure we could list the extensions
which provide core-like functionality in an improved form and separate
those from extensions which provide new functionality.

-- 
-keith
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20171015/a1867c9d/attachment.sig>