[RFC xserver v7 1/2] dri3: Add modifier/multi-plane requests, bump to v1.1
Keith Packard
keithp at keithp.com
Tue Feb 27 21:10:06 UTC 2018
Louis-Francis Ratté-Boulianne <lfrb at collabora.com> writes:
> + The first list of 'drawable_modifiers' contains a set of
> + modifiers which the server considers optimal for the window's
> + current configuration. Using these modifiers to allocate, even
> + if locally suboptimal to the client driver, may result in a
> + more optimal display pipeline, e.g. by avoiding composition.
I think it would be good to explicitly mention the expected
PresentPixmap usage to describe why the window matters at
all. I didn't understand this when just reading the patch.
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID may be passed for 'modifier', in which
> + case the driver may make its own inference as to the exact
> + layout of the buffer(s).
I don't like using a name here which isn't consistent with the actual
semantic. I can easily imagine reading code using this extension and
having to go find the spec to figure out what DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID
could mean in this context. Can we come up with a better name than this?
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_IMPLICIT or DRM_FORMAT_MOD_DRIVER_FIGURES_IT_OUT?
> + Synchronization of access to buffers shared between processes
> + is not defined by this protocol. Without the use of additional
> + extensions not defined by the DRI3 protocol as of version 1.1,
> + synchronization between multiple processes and contexts is
> + considered to follow the implicit model.
> +
> + In this model, the underlying driver is responsible for
> + enforcing a strict ordering such that any reads requested by
> + one process or context are fulfilled before any writes requested
> + by another process or context, as long as that read was
> + definitively submitted before the write (e.g. a through a
> + blocking read command such as glReadPixels or explicitly
> + flushing the command stream through glFlush). A similar
> + dependency exists for reads submitted after writes: the driver
> + must ensure that the write is fully visible and coherent to the
> + read request.
This is a great addition; i think it needs to be in a separate section
from the requests so that it can apply equally to all objects referenced
in the extension.
--
-keith
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20180227/7ff1e851/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list