AW: AW V2: [PATCH xserver] xfree86: Refine drm modes on continuous freq panel
Walter Harms
wharms at bfs.de
Tue Apr 14 08:51:35 UTC 2020
________________________________________
Von: Aaron Ma <aaron.ma at canonical.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. April 2020 10:30
An: Walter Harms; xorg-devel at lists.x.org
Betreff: Re: AW V2: [PATCH xserver] xfree86: Refine drm modes on continuous freq panel
On 4/13/20 5:11 PM, Walter Harms wrote:
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: xorg-devel <xorg-devel-bounces at lists.x.org> im Auftrag von Aaron Ma <aaron.ma at canonical.com>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 11. April 2020 12:14
> An: xorg-devel at lists.x.org; aaron.ma at canonical.com
> Betreff: [PATCH xserver] xfree86: Refine drm modes on continuous freq panel
>
> EDID1.4 replaced GTF Bit with Continuous or Non-Continuous Frequency Display.
>
> Check the "Display Range Limits Descriptor" for GTF support.
> If panel doesn't support GTF, then add gtf modes.
>
> Otherwise X will only show the modes in "Detailed Timing Descriptor".
>
> BugLink: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/313
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Ma <aaron.ma at canonical.com>
> ---
> hw/xfree86/ddc/edid.h | 6 ++++
> hw/xfree86/ddc/interpret_edid.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
> hw/xfree86/ddc/xf86DDC.h | 3 ++
> .../drivers/modesetting/drmmode_display.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/xfree86/ddc/edid.h b/hw/xfree86/ddc/edid.h
> index 750e4270b..dffcb3749 100644
> --- a/hw/xfree86/ddc/edid.h
> +++ b/hw/xfree86/ddc/edid.h
> @@ -262,6 +262,10 @@
> #define MAX_H (_MAX_H(c) + _MAX_H_OFFSET(c))
> #define _MAX_CLOCK(x) x[9]
> #define MAX_CLOCK _MAX_CLOCK(c)
> +#define _DEFAULT_GTF(x) (x[10] == 0x00)
> +#define DEFAULT_GTF _DEFAULT_GTF(c)
> +#define _RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY(x) (x[10] == 0x01)
> +#define RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY _RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY(c)
> #define _HAVE_2ND_GTF(x) (x[10] == 0x02)
> #define HAVE_2ND_GTF _HAVE_2ND_GTF(c)
> #define _F_2ND_GTF(x) (x[12] * 2)
> @@ -490,6 +494,8 @@ struct monitor_ranges {
> int gtf_2nd_j;
> int max_clock_khz;
> int maxwidth; /* in pixels */
> + BOOL supported_default_gtf;
> + BOOL range_limits_only;
> char supported_aspect;
> char preferred_aspect;
> char supported_blanking;
> diff --git a/hw/xfree86/ddc/interpret_edid.c b/hw/xfree86/ddc/interpret_edid.c
> index 17a8f81c0..4f3cbc587 100644
> --- a/hw/xfree86/ddc/interpret_edid.c
> +++ b/hw/xfree86/ddc/interpret_edid.c
> @@ -672,7 +672,19 @@ get_monitor_ranges(Uchar * c, struct monitor_ranges *r)
> r->max_clock = 0;
> if (MAX_CLOCK != 0xff) /* is specified? */
> r->max_clock = MAX_CLOCK * 10 + 5;
> +
> + if (DEFAULT_GTF) {
> + r->supported_default_gtf = TRUE;
> + } else
> + r->supported_default_gtf = FALSE;
> +
> + if (RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY) {
> + r->range_limits_only = TRUE;
> + } else
> + r->range_limits_only = FALSE;
> +
> if (HAVE_2ND_GTF) {
> + r->supported_default_gtf = TRUE;
> r->gtf_2nd_f = F_2ND_GTF;
> r->gtf_2nd_c = C_2ND_GTF;
> r->gtf_2nd_m = M_2ND_GTF;
> @@ -751,6 +763,26 @@ validate_version(int scrnIndex, struct edid_version *r)
> return TRUE;
> }
>
> +Bool
> +gtf_supported(int scrnIndex, xf86MonPtr mon)
> +{
>
> + struct detailed_monitor_section *det_timing_des = mon->det_mon;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (mon && (mon->ver.revision < 4)) {
>
> can mon be NULL ? if yes det_timing_des = mon->det_mon; will crash.
> a simple
> if (!mon)
> return FALSE;
>
> clears the fog.
Will change in V2.
>
> + if (GTF_SUPPORTED(mon->features.msc))
> + return TRUE;
> + } else {
>
> maybe you can improve readability this way:
>
> if ( mon->ver.revision < 4 ) {
> if (GTF_SUPPORTED(mon->features.msc))
> return TRUE;
> else
> return FALSE;
> }
Only return TRUE in if condition.
Default return FALSE at the function end.
so far i understand there is no need to loop if you have Version < 4
so you can return early.
happy hacking
re,
wh
>
>
>
>
>
> + for (i = 0; i < DET_TIMINGS; det_timing_des = &(mon->det_mon[++i])) {
> + if ((det_timing_des) && (det_timing_des->type == DS_RANGES))
>
> using a simple loop makes it more readable, and avoids the init at start
> (case mon==NULL). The scope of det_timing_des is small you could call it dms or so.
>
> for(i=0;i < DET_TIMINGS;i++)
> {
> struct detailed_monitor_section *det_timing_des = &(mon->det_mon[i]))
Change in V2.
> if (! det_timing_des) // is this possible ?
> return FALSE;
No this will change the behavior, all det_timing_des shoulde be checked,
in case there are NULL detailed timing descriptor.
Thanks,
Aaron
> if ( det_timing_des->type == DS_RANGES &&
> det_timing_des->section.ranges.supported_default_gtf )
> return TRUE;
>
> }
>
> hope that helps,
> re,
> wh
> + if (det_timing_des->section.ranges.supported_default_gtf)
> + return TRUE;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return FALSE;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Returns true if HDMI, false if definitely not or unknown.
> */
> diff --git a/hw/xfree86/ddc/xf86DDC.h b/hw/xfree86/ddc/xf86DDC.h
> index 7d81ab911..2fa4ba55a 100644
> --- a/hw/xfree86/ddc/xf86DDC.h
> +++ b/hw/xfree86/ddc/xf86DDC.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ extern _X_EXPORT Bool xf86SetDDCproperties(ScrnInfoPtr pScreen, xf86MonPtr DDC);
> extern _X_EXPORT Bool
> xf86MonitorIsHDMI(xf86MonPtr mon);
>
> +extern _X_EXPORT Bool
> +gtf_supported(int scrnIndex, xf86MonPtr mon);
> +
> extern _X_EXPORT DisplayModePtr
> FindDMTMode(int hsize, int vsize, int refresh, Bool rb);
>
> diff --git a/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/drmmode_display.c b/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/drmmode_display.c
> index 8e6b697c4..031e5efea 100644
> --- a/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/drmmode_display.c
> +++ b/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/drmmode_display.c
> @@ -2459,7 +2459,7 @@ drmmode_output_add_gtf_modes(xf86OutputPtr output, DisplayModePtr Modes)
> int max_x = 0, max_y = 0;
> float max_vrefresh = 0.0;
>
> - if (mon && GTF_SUPPORTED(mon->features.msc))
> + if (mon && gtf_supported(output->scrn->scrnIndex, mon))
> return Modes;
>
> if (!has_panel_fitter(output))
> --
> 2.26.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list