libshadow + fb fix

[Erick M]

Daniel, are you trying to bully anyone here? what is that?

Just let people ask questions!!

noone forces you to answer if you are not interested, but spare us your
sarcastic bullshit!!

Wanna be smart and admired by your pairs? keep the facts, clean your ego,
mister-I'll-always-know-more-than-you


Best Regards,


On 5/24/06, Daniel Stone <daniel at freedesktop.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:59:20PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > * Adam Jackson <ajax at nwnk.net> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 17 May 2006 10:39, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > > > This fix adds some (non-compiled) file from libfd to libshadow,
> > > > so the misssing symbols can be resolved.
> > >
> > > Absolutely not.
> > >
> > > Notice the big chunks of fbcmap.c under conditional compilation.
> > > It has to be compiled once per DDX to match the #defines for each one.
> >
> > hmm, so it has to be added to the individual DDX'es instead of libfb ?
>
> DUDE, THIS IS WHAT IS DONE ALREADY.
>
> > AFAICS there are exactly two cases in fbcmap.c:
> > a) XFree86Server is defined
> > b) -''- not defined
> >
> > So we could easily split it off into two files and add just the right
> > file to the individual DDX'es.
>
> Yes, if you were sufficiently bored, but that would mean still more
> duplication for the meantime, so no.
>
> > Could anyone give me an hint, why and when XFree86Server exactly
> > is defined ?
>
> grep XFree86Server configure.ac $(find ./ -type f -name Makefile.am)
>
> Again, can you *please* actually look at what's going on before you ask
> questions?  It's quicker for all of us, and doesn't make you look quite
> so stupid on publicly-archived mailing lists.
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-modular mailing list
> xorg-modular at lists.x.org
> http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-modular
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20060524/6eeb47b2/attachment.html