[Xorg] The big multiconsole nasty
Michel Dänzer
michel at daenzer.net
Tue Jul 6 16:48:47 PDT 2004
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 16:20 +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
>
> Thomas Winischhofer writes:
> >
> > Well, in reality they don't have to. Looking at each others code has
> > been done, is being done and will be done anyway. A bit more of
> > cooperation between fbdev and X driver developers (if not identical)
> > would minimize this "agony" (if any). And finally: fbdev drivers are
>
> There still is a little obstacle that is tied to the license of the
> drivers. Kernel drivers are GPL.
The DRM drivers aren't, at least not exclusively.
> To use them as a sample to derive code for an MIT Licensed driver one
> would have to go thru a 'clean room' step.
The author can always dual license his code.
Of course, this isn't to say I wouldn't welcome one driver to rule them
all. :)
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
More information about the xorg
mailing list