[Xorg] Re: 64-bit applications and hostnames that start with a digit
keithp at keithp.com
Wed Mar 24 19:03:23 PST 2004
Around 18 o'clock on Mar 24, Paul Anderson wrote:
> From the header files I've seen, INADDR_NONE is defined properly
> to cast the -1 to (in_addr_t), so this seems like a safer way
> to accomplish what the original code does.
Looks identical except for using in_addr_t and INADDR_NONE. Seems fine to
me; I guess there's a question as to whether there are machines without
these values; changing it will certainly uncover any such machines when
people try to build.
I suggest this as a post-188.8.131.52 change though; it may accidentally break
things which have worked.
In the modular tree, we can test for in_addr_t and INADDR_NONE and use them
when present, and avoid them where missing all automatically.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the xorg