Bug in module loading system on x86-64?
alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Sat Oct 2 08:06:41 PDT 2004
On Sad, 2004-10-02 at 16:21, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> > To me that sounds like a strong motivation to just use dlloader instead.
> Do we really need any more excuses? It seems that people have already
> made up their mind wether or not they have understood the implmentation
> of either of the choices.
Will it make any difference - are these in fact model rather than loader
problems ? If the modules are not built -fPIC and are small model then
they can only be loaded below about 3.95Gb.
More information about the xorg