Xorg version number change
daniel at freedesktop.org
Mon Oct 11 02:48:46 PDT 2004
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 11:46:26AM +0200, Roland Mainz wrote:
> Egbert Eich wrote:
> > Roland Mainz writes:
> > > Kristian H?gsberg wrote:
> > > > This change doesn't look right. The 6.8.1 release is on the
> > > > XORG-6_8-branch, and that's where 6.8.2 will come from. HEAD is going
> > > > to be 6.9.0 or 7.0 or whatever gets decided.
> > > ^^^^^ ^^^
> > >
> > > Please NO. Please simply stop this version number inflation. Even for
> > > the last release it wasn't really justified to bump the version number
> > > to 6.8 where 6.7.1 was sufficient (AFAIK the only argument was the
> > > introduction of the "Composite", "DAMAGE" etc. extensions).
> > > IMO the next major release should be named X11R6.8.2 unless something
> > > really really big changes (and if I recall it correctly X11R7 is
> > > reserved for the autotooled tree right now).
> > It has been argeed upon that the x.x.y rleases with y > 1 are bugfix
> > and security update releases for the x.x.0 releases. That decisison
> > has been reflected in the branch sceme of the tree.
> Sounds reasonable. Hopefully noone complains when X11R6.10.0 gets
> released (which alphabetically sorts lower than "X11R6.9.0"... :) ...
... so don't use alphabetic sort when things like this matters.
> > We need to be able to 'mark' a bugfix release to distinguish it from
> > the release it was based on. That was what the third number was
> > added for. It hasn't existed in the X.Org numbering sceme so far if
> > I recall correctly.
> Wasn't there a X11R6.5.1 release (and my Solaris/CDE desktop claims
> (=output of sdtwsinfo) to be based on X11R6.4.1) ?
Back in 1994? :)
Daniel Stone <daniel at freedesktop.org>
freedesktop.org: powering your desktop http://www.freedesktop.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the xorg