The ati petition
rlrevell at joe-job.com
Sat Sep 4 13:39:03 PDT 2004
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 14:45, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'm not sure it is any worse to be at ATI's mercy than at Xorg's mercy.
> It is true that I could look at the code,
> but I've always found X frighteningly esoteric.
> Is there a simple introduction anywhere?
> [I've been known to compile programs from CVS,
> and even dabble in C++;
> but I always imagined X had more spheres inside spheres
> than Dante's Hell.]
You are correct. The X code base has the cruft of the ages. Take a
look at ./lib/Xt/Composite.c. It looks like they wrote it in C++ and
ported it to C, hacking in class inheritance and what not manually.
Possibly related to C++ being less than two years old when this code was
I have heard rumors that there is even some Hungarian notation in the X
See the 'warnings' thread for what people are doing about it.
More information about the xorg