The ati petition
alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Sun Sep 5 04:44:52 PDT 2004
On Sul, 2004-09-05 at 13:37, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> You describe the version of Xorg in FC-2 as a "vendor release".
> Are there any "pure" Xorg RPMs?
The FC-2 Xorg is very very close to base.
> Or does one have to compile from the CVS?
> And if I did that, and the problem persisted,
> would it be more likely to be examined?
Probably not 8) What would be much more useful would be to test the
CVS release either the rawhide RPMs Mike did or the tarball.
> Incidentally, can one assume that the problem is in the ATI driver,
> and if so, could one compile that without compiling the whole system?
Generally yes. You should actually be able to drop the FC1 radeon module
into FC2 X and have it run.
More information about the xorg