The ati petition
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Mon Sep 13 09:16:26 PDT 2004
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:59:29 -0400 (EDT), Vladimir Dergachev
<volodya at mindspring.com> wrote:
> >> RE_CLK: 0 - Dynamic
> >> 1 - Force on
> >>
> >> To me this would mean that the RE (Render Engine) clock is not active if
> >> there is nothing for the render engine to do.
> >>
> >> Keep in mind that this is mere speculation. Also, some ATI sample code
> >> writes 1 to such registers with comment that "some versions of ASIC do not
> >> properly implement dynamic clocks". Linux drivers do not have this code
> >> though, so this might have been fixed in production version.
> >
> > I recently applied a patch from ati for enabling dynamic clock scaling
> > to xorg cvs. enable it with option "DynamicClocks". it provides a
> > noticeable increase in battery life on my m6 laptop.
>
> Cool ! Does this also imply that HEAD is unfrozen ?
I dunno. I applied it a month or so ago, prior to the freeze. it's in 6.8.0.
>
> Alex, could you clear up one thing for me - does current HEAD work with
> DRM ? At least r200 chips ?
yeah it should. r100 and r200.
Alex
>
> thank you !
>
> Vladimir Dergachev
>
>
>
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >>
> >> best
> >>
> >> Vladimir Dergachev
> >>
> >>> The basic clock rate used nowadays is high enough and the area of the
> >>> chip die is big enough that these issues are non-negligeable. Of course,
> >>> restarting the stopped blocks can also be a bit tricky for the chip
> >>> designers.
> >>>
> >>> Another rather popular technique is to step the clock speed but that is
> >>> much more complex to implement for the designers which is why few ASICs
> >>> really do it.
> >>>
> >>> Of course, this is off-topic but I could not resist. Bad bad me. It
> >>> should be said I have minimum experience in this domain so, the usual
> >>> disclaimers apply.
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> Mathieu
> >>> --
> >>> Mathieu Lacage <mathieu at gnu.org>
> >>>
> >>>
More information about the xorg
mailing list