New libXvMC wrapper.
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Tue Sep 21 16:24:21 PDT 2004
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:54:35 -0400, Adam Jackson <ajax at nwnk.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 September 2004 18:34, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> > Hi, list!
> > Anybody opposed to this going in it's current form? If not, it will be
> > enabled for linux and gcc, where I know the -nostartfiles option will work.
> Why do you need -nostartfiles?
> As mentioned earlier, the XvMC protocol really should ask the server for the
> name of the client driver to load, the way DRI does. But this is certainly
> better than requiring every XvMC client to know about every possible driver.
I agree. This is at least a good first step. this might help get
more xvmc drivers going. eventually we can write a full fledged libGL
> - ajax
More information about the xorg