'transset issues'

Thomas Lübking thomas.luebking at gmx.net
Sun Jan 2 19:11:33 PST 2005


Well, that's the great thing about FLOSS, right?
Just take your favourite WM, write a patch (shouldn't be too hard, at least 
not the basical things) and mail it to the maintainer ;)

However, this may last some time, so best thing could be to write a WM that 
can (via NETWM?) run aside the real WM, listen to events (activte, 
deactivate, add of windows) and handle them automatically (alongside a config 
file) - but i'm not sure what restrictions this would cause (besides it 
wouldn't work with non std WMs as long as you can't do a special handling on 
them).
calling "transset 0.75" got annoying after some time and i do hardly belive it 
is used too much :)

Regards,
Thomas

On Sunday 02 January 2005 14:58, Patrick Leslie Polzer wrote:
> Yes, I agree with you that this should be WM stuff. But there are a lot
> of window
> managers out there, and I suppose most of them do not have support for
> translucency
> yet and will not for quite some time. There are also some that probably
> will never have
> any support for it (e.g. twm). So it is still necessary to extend transset.



More information about the xorg mailing list