Current CVS: static build broken?

[Keith Packard]

Around 19 o'clock on Jan 14, Roland Mainz wrote:

> What was the reason for writing a "xf1bpp" driver instead of using "mfb" ?

I believe xf1bpp matches the old PC MGA bitmap format, which is something
like big-endian bits in little endian bytes.

-keith


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20050114/0275d781/attachment.pgp>