SCO port update - what now?

[Adam Jackson]

On Friday 10 June 2005 13:09, Kean Johnston wrote:
> > Becuase not all (in fact many) compilers support #error, but not
> > #warning. Thats a GCC-ism. Unless you are refering to the change in
>
> Actually I mis-spoke. It is not a GCC-ism, I think it may be a C99ism.
> Bottom line is, not all compilers support it.

If we really don't want to require #warning, then we need to fix Mesa, 
fontconfig, and the i810 and sis drivers as well.

I'm a bit dismayed that there exist compilers that don't simply throw out 
unrecognized preprocessor directives (since you basically have to do that for 
#pragma).

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20050610/50bcb13d/attachment.pgp>