RandR bugs

[Alan Hourihane]

On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:21 -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 11:12 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > 
> > Also, I'm not sure RRFunc is needed at all. It seems to me that
> > xf86SwitchMode() is good enough to let the driver handle the necessary
> > switch.
> > 
> > The only thing that is missing is a call that the driver can make to
> > obtain the current rotation mode (i.e. randrp->rotation). Removing the
> > need completely for RRFunc.
> 
> Isn't DriverFunc still useful in that it allows the driver to cancel a
> rotation that it doesn't support?

If SwitchMode returned false, why isn't that good enough to cancel the
operation too ?

Alan.