glib dependency for the X Server

[Daniel Stone]

On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 12:58:47PM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 19:41 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > So I think glib wouldn't be that bad of a choice. 
> > 
> > abort().
> 
> Did anybody asked the glib developers if that could be changed ? It
> would probably not be that big a deal to add some OOM handler that
> defaults to abort() but can be set to something else by the user (Xorg
> in this case). 

If it were fixed, it would mean that adoption of glib would need to wait
until we could realistically expect the stable version of glib
containing the fix was in all distros that we would expect to integrate
the new stable version of Xorg.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20060403/1db566a3/attachment.pgp>