[SCM TRANSITION] Re: Proposal: move Randr protocol and library to git

[Adam Jackson]

On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:22, Egbert Eich wrote:
> Roland Scheidegger writes:
>  > I don't really think it's important if everything is moved at once,
>  > however I very much agree that it would be painful if some parts moved
>  > to OTHER scms. If some parts stay in cvs for now that's not too bad,
>  > everyone knows how to use it anyway.
>
> That the number of SCMs starts to proliferate is really my main
> concern.

Anyone who tries to migrate to an SCM that is not comparably capable to git 
can find hosting elsewhere.  This is a short list.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20060418/41481265/attachment.pgp>