Release process for Xorg 7.1

[Adam Jackson]

On Tuesday 25 April 2006 09:02, Egbert Eich wrote:
> If we decide to ship new documentation the way Keith suggests we
> should migrate any existing documentation in the same fashion.
> It may sound reasonalbe now to treat them differently - but
> some years down the road nobody will remember why it is done
> that way - espcecially as the reasons will sound more strange
> then than now.
> So since we are currently still in a big clean up phase why not
> make everything as consistent as possible?

I don't object to this reorganization.  I'm not going to actively work on it 
as part of the 7.1 effort though.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20060426/d28ac762/attachment.pgp>