Xorg 3D acceleration for neomagic
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Sat Aug 12 14:03:03 PDT 2006
On 8/12/06, Kacper Wysocki <kacperw at online.no> wrote:
> While I am on the subject of the neomagic driver (and anyone who's
> read this far must be at least remotely interested in it), I'm
> *positive* that I found a driver with decent 3D acceleration for the
> neomagic chip, some odd years ago. (By decent I mean armagetron and
> glxgears worked without being choppy). A harddrive corruption later I
> could no longer find these drivers.
> In recent years I heard that Red Hat took over development of the
> neomagic driver, and my hope was that accelerated rendering would
> finally be implemented. Alas, the most recent post out there about
> neomagic quotes a developer as saying that the chip was so slow it's
> dubious whether acceleration would make any difference. It *does* make
> a difference, and increases the usefulness of aging hardware.
> Does anyone on this list know what happened to the 3D support in
> neomagic? Or maybe what it would take to get 3D support implemented in
> the driver, or who has the specs necessary?
As far as I know there was never a 3D driver for the neomagic chips.
Even the 2D driver was binary only for a while. Only the later
neomagic chips had a 3d engine, and even that was pretty limited. I
believe redhat or precision insight wrote the 2D driver. neomagic
never gave out any specs as far as I know. I don't know if anyone
outside of neomagic has teh specs anymore. Xv support in the driver
was developed via reverse engineering. You'll probably have to do the
same for 3D.
More information about the xorg