Suggested Xprint DDX reorg

[Julien Lafon]

On 1/5/06, Adam Jackson <ajax at nwnk.net> wrote:
> We've got five DDXes that are complex enough to need or want auxiliary tools
> or config bits.  Right now we have:
>
> xorg/Xprint
> xorg/XpConfig
> xorg/hw/xfree86
> xorg/hw/xfree86/utils
> xorg/hw/dmx
> xorg/hw/dmx/config
> xorg/hw/darwin
> xorg/hw/darwin/utils
> xorg/hw/xwin
> xorg/hw/xwin/xlaunch
>
> For parallelism I'd rather see the Xprint DDX moved under hw and its config
> bits under that:
>
> xorg/hw/Xprint
> xorg/hw/Xprint/XpConfig
> xorg/hw/xfree86
> xorg/hw/xfree86/utils
> ...
>
> Does anyone have a compelling case against this?

See below.

> If not I'll probably shuffle
> this around sometime this weekend.

It does not sound not logical to me - Xprint DDX is no physical
hardware so why should it be tagged as such?

Julien
--
Julien Lafon
Senior Staff Engineer, Hitachi