Handling of driver protocol extensions in cvs

[Daniel Stone]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:29:20PM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote:
> Agreed, a proliferation of driver extensions isn't in anyone's interest.
> 
> Aivils Stoss posted a description of a generic extension a few days ago,
> which might serve as a mechanism to standardise the driver extensions -
> and even a simple key-value get-set extension where each driver could
> publish keys would probably go a long way.

This is not wildly useful without a standardised set of keys.