Resolution issues on i915GM w/ xorg-x11-drv-i810-1.4.1.3-3.1
Philip Prindeville
philipp_subx at redfish-solutions.com
Thu Jul 13 15:29:10 PDT 2006
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Charles Allen wrote:
>> Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx <at> redfish-solutions.com> writes:
>>
>>
>>> Section "Screen"
>>> ...
>>> SubSection "Display"
>>> Viewport 0 0
>>> Depth 24
>>> Modes "1680x1050" "1280x1024"
>>> EndSubSection
>>> EndSection
>>>
>>
>> In trying to track down a similar problem with a 915G (Dell GX280)
>> driving a
>> Dell 1703FP, it seems that it doesn't like the "Depth 24" line.
>> Sticking in a
>> Depth of 16 works (32 doesn't, but that may be a video RAM limitation).
>>
>> With Depth 24, this thing was convinced it was running at 1600x1200.
>> With Depth
>> 16, it correctly ends up at 1280x1024.
>>
> That's not the issue (I don't think).
>
> Because if I remove the "1280x1024", it works fine in 24-bit deep mode.
Grrr... I mean if I remove "1680x1050", it works fine (in 1280x1024) mode
in 24-bits deep. In other words,
Modes "1680x1050" "1280x1024"
results in a 1280x1024 h/w resolution with a virtual size of 1680x1050 (and
doing the ctl-alt-minus would not switch h/w resolution modes).
If I use:
Modes "1280x1024"
only, then it comes up at the right h/w resolution with the same virtual
size.
Very strange.
-PHilip
> For whatever reason, it's not preferring the 1:1 match of virtual size to
> actual physical resolution...
> And what was weird before is even though it said "Built-in mode
> "1280x1024"",
> it wouldn't switch to that mode on ctl-alt-num_plus.
>
> Anyone else have any ideas?
>
> -Philip
More information about the xorg
mailing list