mga driver / HALlib
Ian Romanick
idr at us.ibm.com
Fri Jul 28 08:58:58 PDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> Sure. But here we're again at "* nobody cares enough". :-( What the
> users usually see is the regression in the driver.
A certain amount of this is actually on my todo list. Is there a grand,
unified list anywhere of exactly what features on which hardware
currently require the use of mgahal? The only thing that I know of is
dual-head on G400 cards. Is there more?
I tend to agree with the sentiment of gutting all the mgahal support
from the driver. Then we can gradually add the missing features back
one at a time.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEyjRCX1gOwKyEAw8RAngFAKCXr8Ub2InOFY3w3IKrCZIT21HYAwCfYOaJ
EtEUwmcnfZ+5k8yovAafSeo=
=ObKX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the xorg
mailing list