xkbActions.c + #ifdef XFree86Server
daniel at fooishbar.org
Wed Jun 7 11:59:04 PDT 2006
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:45:12PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> schrieb:
> > > I'm currently working on moving the DDX dependent code to the
> > > servers itself and let it be called via an ddx_callback structure
> > > (as we already discussed lately), so I'm going to put it in there,
> > > if nobody has an better idea.
> > Actions should be punted up to the DDX using a filter mechanism
> > (return 'stolen', 'continue', or 'drop it').
> I'm currently just doing (formal) code separation to get clean
> frontlines, leaving the semantics unchanged. The chance of errors
> should be quite minimal. Let's get this done first, before
> introducing new semantics.
> Meanwhile we of can carefully think about your filter mechanism.
> What exaclty do you have in mind ?
if (XkbDDXFilterAction(pDev, action) == RESULT_STOLEN)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the xorg