[Mesa3d-dev] Missing X_GLXvop_BindTexImageEXT

[Keith Whitwell]

Dave Airlie wrote:
> 
>> In the case of X.org, OTOH, you are *only* talking about the software 
>> rasterizer for Indirect GLX.  I don't think it's unreasonable to say 
>> that the policy could change to make that track the Mesa stable branch 
>> or even just to track Mesa releases.
> 
> Actually with all this talk of new extensions we need it now more than 
> ever.. we couldn't develop EXT_tfp or EXT_include_inferiors in only one 
> tree... we need to co-develop the client and server sides.. hence the 
> GLX protocol for client and server sides need to be defined in the 
> glproto module...

Ah well, it seemed like too easy of an escape...

Keith