State of the archive

[Daniel Stone]

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:27:30PM -0400, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2006, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >They were put in a week ago, after five weeks of public harassment and
> >questioning.  If there has not been earthshaking change since then, I
> >don't think the situation can even remotely be called 'fixed'.
> 
> The earthshaking change is that the archive has finally been cleaned up 
> after
> waiting nearly that much time for the discussion of how to go about fixing 
> it.

Are you seriously trying to suggest that the copying of two files (four,
if you count index.html), was blocked on a total archive reorganisation?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20060511/45febea7/attachment.pgp>