Intel i915GM with SDVO CH7021A support?
nodenet at hotmail.com
Mon Nov 13 16:32:38 PST 2006
>From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied at gmail.com>
>To: "Will ." <nodenet at hotmail.com>
>CC: eric at anholt.net, xorg at lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: Re: Intel i915GM with SDVO CH7021A support?
>Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:23:17 +1100
>> > >
>> > > A few months ago I got a version of the mode setting Intel 915 driver
>> >from a
>> > > git tree posted on airlied's live journal. With a bit of fiddling and
>> > > tweaking this has been working very well and I can get very close to
>> > > refresh rates required for video etc.
>> > >
>> > > I've had no success with the CH7021A SDVO support under linux at all.
>> > > Chrontel refuse to supply any details about how to program the chip.
>> > > manage to get the DVI working with the IEGD binary driver but it
>> > > recognise or work the CH7021A at all. I'd really like to get the
>> > > working as it supports HDTV, SCART out and exact TV refresh rates and
>> > > etc etc. Without proper support it's impossible to adjust the
>> > > parameters as it is with the Windows driver.
>> > >
>> > > If any one has any suggestion or can help me it would be appreciated.
>> > > quite happy to try any experimental code or hack something together
>> > > is a bit of detail about how to get the 7021 to respond available. I
>> > > understand it may be possible to snoop the I2C bus and potentially
>> > > what is going on with the SDVO. Would this be a viable method or
>> > > just be wasting my time trying? I should probably know the answer to
>> > > but it would help if someone could confirm this... Once the PC has
>> >booted up
>> > > is it possible to switch the SDVO 7021A TV out on using a BIOS call,
>> >had a
>> > > brief look in the VESA spec but I could easily have missed this.
>> > > if a BIOS call is available presumably the snooping method will
>> > > otherwise would it be possible / practical to snoop the I2C bus at
>> > > using some sort of TSR when the TV Out is enabled?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for any help anyone can provide
>> >You're probably going to have minimal luck trying to get the BIOS to do
>> >anything special. While we haven't done any TV development in the
>> >modesetting branch of xf86-video-intel git, it has the continuation of
>> >the work that airlied started, and I'd love to help integrate any
>> >appropriate code for TV support. If you can get the master branch to
>> >turn your TV on at all, you may be able to use the BIOS tracing tools
>> >that are floating around to figure out what the BIOS is doing and
>> >replicate it.
>> >Unfortunately, I don't think I'll have any time to work on SDVO TV
>> >support directly any time soon.
>> >Eric Anholt anholt at FreeBSD.org
>> >eric at anholt.net eric.anholt at intel.com
>>Thanks for the feedback, I've had a few attempts at getting the TV to turn
>>on using the master branch from a while ago (220.127.116.11) and havent been
>>succesful. To be honest I seem to remember that the only way I've ever
>>able to get the TV out on is to plug it in and boot up without anything
>>attached. I may have another play with this and see if I get lucky. My
>>thoughts now turn to a more extreme (and probably more stupid) :)))...
>>method Ideally I'd like to do the I2C snooping under windows (with the
>>working driver) but I'm not sure that trying to do that with existing
>>software that I wouldnt be giving myself a very BIG headache (i.e. would I
>>just be getting myself down a bit of a blind alley). I've seen a simple
>>snooper that runs on the parrallel port which I guess is far too slow to
>>snoop SDVO, however I was wondering just how fast it would have to be to
>>it in the real world i.e. if I got the snooper to work under USB would I
>>cooking on gas or is that still way too slow? I have a sneaky suspiscion
>>that this is not enough alone... do I really need to trap the writes to
>>other registers as well? I'd give the kernel debugger or something similar
>>go if I thought it would work?? If I put a breakpoint on the offset of the
>>I2C read write functions relative to the base address of the appropriate
>>(assuming I can even work all the out) I should be able to trace back the
>>calling parameters? Jeez I got a headache just typing all that is it
>>completly implausable or is it vaguely plausable (best I can hope for)
>>and where does this stick of dynamite fit in? (or is that where I've been
>>going wrong before)
>You might not need to write an actual i2c or sdvo snooper, you might
>be able to just write an SDVO test app for Windows that talks to the
>chip by bitbanging and reads back the current status, there is lots of
>info on SDVO control registers in the modesetting branch (lots more
>than when I spent hours staring at it and finally guessed what the
>register formats were)...
>or if you can get vbetool to set a tv-mode somehow, you could use my
>BIOS tracing "hack"
>you need to build it, run it, find the io registers it uses, change
>the values in thunk.c, do stuff, watch dumps... rinse, tear hair out,
Thanks, that advice is very much appreciated, and gives me a little hope
that I may get something working.
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters!
More information about the xorg