via k8m890 very slow with vesa
libv at skynet.be
Mon Nov 27 13:46:39 PST 2006
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 10:02:46PM +0100, Henrik Lundberg wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 23:02 +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> > This is time wasted. It's not that hard to provide proper K8M890
> > support.
> Well, that may be so, and eventually I'd be happy to use a chip-specific
> driver. But for now I just need to have a usable desktop. This is why I
> use vesa since no prepackaged driver for my chip exist in Debian yet.
> You may think lazy of me, but I honestly haven't got the time to invest
> in skills so I'd easily get unichrome working. If it's really no problem
> I would very much appreciate a simple HOWTO.
> I have VT3230 and on unichrome.sf.net you state that Sadly, support for
> anything newer than VT3108 is currently nonexistent. If this is not the
> case, I'd be happy to try it out.
> Best regards
There is no support there for this device, and until i get my hands on
this hardware, there will be no support there. Next purchase (whenever,
if ever) for me will be a VT3118, and that's at least 2 generations
So don't wait for support from my end.
What I'm saying is that trying to make vesa performance slightly less
horrible is not going to take much less time as it would take to add
proper VT3230 support.
More information about the xorg