Keysym additions.

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Fri Sep 22 05:06:37 PDT 2006


On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:59:32AM -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 11:41 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On newish Apple laptops (those with USB keyboards), the Linux kernel can
> > optionally generate a keycode for fn instead of handling it internally.
> > IIRC the behaviour Jim mentions for OLPC (handling it internally but
> > generating a keycode as well) was discussed but considered not useful.
> 
> Why not?  Without the rationale, just saying "was discussed but
> considered not useful" is not adding anything to the discussion.

Well, what does it do?  Fn+F5 allows me to see what's going on.
Fn+WirelessEnableDisable doesn't tell me anything I don't already know.

Again, consider Fn as a modifier, because that's what it does: modifies
the behaviour of existing keys.  Getting Ctrl+^C wouldn't be
tremendously useful.  Getting Ctrl+C is useful.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20060922/7721649f/attachment.pgp>


More information about the xorg mailing list