Status of xgl?
rand_chars at rogers.com
Wed Sep 27 15:09:06 PDT 2006
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:58:46 +0200, "Hanno Böck" <ml at hboeck.de> said:
> Beside that, is there a reason why xorg-server is still one package? After the
> splitting, it would seem to be obvious to me to have an xorg-server,
> kdriver-server, xgl-server package etc. That would make merging obsolete and
> xgl could have it's own releases. But it'd probably need some more splitting
> to move out the redundant parts.
Well, the reason is that there's a large amount of shared code (the DIX) that
gets hooked rather deeply into the various X servers. I suppose that the DIX
could be factored out into a shared library (libxorgdix.so or such) but nobody
really did it, and it doesn't seem to be especially high on the priority list
of anyone working on Xorg.
More information about the xorg