xavier.bestel at free.fr
Tue Feb 6 07:39:20 PST 2007
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 13:48 +0000, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 18:06 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:04 -0500, David Reveman wrote:
> >>> Non-contiguous windows are important so I wouldn't want an
> >>> implementation that didn't support that. It didn't add any complexity to
> >>> support it in my implementation but I can't be 100% sure of that yet as
> >>> it's not fully complete though.
> >> Yeah, I can't imagine that will be all that complicated. How about the
> >> ability to map from multiple representations of the same window?
> >>From the look of it Mandriva's X server has that too.
> Not sure what you are saying here as this whole thread, while very
> interesting to read, is completely over my head.
> I will say that in Mandriva, our X server is just the stock 1.2 release
> albeit with a couple of patches to make it behave better with
> compiz/beryl etc. (that is for cooker, for 2007.0, we are using 1.1.1)
I've seen videos where a window is mapped twice onscreen, once normal
and once mirrored. The user seems to be able to interact correctly with
both "instances" of the window.
More information about the xorg