GPL and missing licenses in xf86-input-keyboard? (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-keyboard1.2.2)
jon at radscan.com
Tue Sep 18 15:14:29 PDT 2007
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Paulo Cesar Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 06:34:27PM -0300, Paulo Cesar Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> Hopefully a discussion like this one can reach the proper
> people. There is nothing preventing a GPL X server, the same way
> there is nothing preventing Linux, but I am sure there are people
> that would be more comfortable if it did not exist. For some weird
> reason, people prefer to have KDE vs Gnome, or Linux vs BSD, etc.
> but only one X. The code you talk about is trivial, not something
> one would write in a weekend, but doesn't require a group of genius
> people to (re)write.
But what would be the point?? What would you gain?
>>> or, there is so
>>> much changes from XFree86/Xorg people on it, that the original code may
>>> be only a few lines
Hehe, you've never looked at the code have you?
>>> and since it is an open standard, one could rewrite the missing pieces
>>> of code.
Well as the standard is open, you could rewrite the whole damn thing
from scratch if you wanted to.
>>> I would support the decision of, from now on, not making restrictions
>>> of only accepting BSD/MIT style license in the X source tree.
I would support the notion of not shoving stalmanist dogma into X,
but that's just me.
mailto:jon at radscan.com
"No Kill I" -Horta
More information about the xorg