xf86-video-radeonhd pushed.

Igor Mozolevsky igor at hybrid-lab.co.uk
Wed Sep 19 08:19:04 PDT 2007


On 19/09/2007, JM Ibanez <jm at orangeandbronze.com> wrote:
>
> "Igor Mozolevsky" <igor at hybrid-lab.co.uk> writes:
>
> > On 19/09/2007, Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 02:57:43PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> >> > On 19/09/2007, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > On 9/18/07, Luc Verhaegen <libv at skynet.be> wrote:
> >> > > > As the topic states, it's out there... even though it will throw
> up
> >> its
> >> > > > hands at 95% of the cards out there, it's out.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Find it at
> >> > > > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/driver/xf86-video-radeonhd
> >> > >
> >> > > The http one doesn't seem to work.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm behind a firewall so I can't use the git protocol.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm trying this:
> >> > >
> >> > > git clone
> >> > > http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/driver/xf86-video-radeonhd/
> >> >
> >> > Why not just dump it into  ftp.x.org/pub/individual/driver for those
> who
> >> > just want the file without the added hassle of protocol on top of
> >> protocol
> >> > on top of N other protocols wrappers?  Problems are always simple -
> >> there's
> >> > no need to reinvent the wheel just because some guy feels like doing
> >> > something different for a year...
> >>
> >> daniels at psyence:~/x/xorg/driver/xf86-video-radeonhd% ls -R .git | wc -l
> >> 49
> >>
> >> Which file do you want?  Last I checked, FTP didn't really do revision
> >> control, but maybe that's just me.
> >
> >
> > True, but at least it allows you to retrieve a  source tarball without
> > having to install yet-another-version-control-system... and it takes
> care of
> > stupid network topologies...
>
> ... and the said driver isn't even released yet, I believe; throwing a
> source tarball to ftp.x.org implies that it's being released. I haven't
> checked it out, but I'm pretty sure it's not even close to production
> quality -- and therefore *you* have to track the HEAD of the tree too if
> you want to use and test it.


I've clearly misunderstood what  "pushed" and "it's out" mean...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20070919/cbeb635c/attachment.html>


More information about the xorg mailing list