having an xorg not binded to a virtual terminal?
daniel at fooishbar.org
Thu Apr 3 03:01:39 PDT 2008
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:07:14PM -0400, mcr at simtone.net wrote:
> I'd rather prefer that the whole VT switchting code moved into the driver
> itself as a function pointer, perhaps with the existing code available
> as default code.
Why the driver? It's not driver-specific at all.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the xorg