having an xorg not binded to a virtual terminal?

[Daniel Stone]

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:07:14PM -0400, mcr at simtone.net wrote:
> I'd rather prefer that the whole VT switchting code moved into the driver
> itself as a function pointer, perhaps with the existing code available
> as default code.  

Why the driver? It's not driver-specific at all.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20080403/53d8fcd7/attachment.pgp>