Recent mesa commit
Ben Gamari
ben at mw0.ath.cx
Fri Apr 4 16:33:02 PDT 2008
Hey,
How are you debugging this anyways? If I'm not mistaken, this code runs
in the server (although I'm notoriously bad at figuring out where code
runs in the X stack). Do you have a second machine to remote debug from?
Attached is a naive (also non-functional) attempt to teach
driConfigEqual about GLX_DONT_CARE. Sorry about the whitespace changes.
Anyways, even outside of the context of this problem, shouldn't
driConfigEqual check for DONT_CARE?
- Ben
diff --git a/src/glx/x11/dri_glx.c b/src/glx/x11/dri_glx.c
index 004af0b..f22888e 100644
--- a/src/glx/x11/dri_glx.c
+++ b/src/glx/x11/dri_glx.c
@@ -524,10 +524,13 @@ scalarEqual(__GLcontextModes *mode, unsigned int
attrib, unsigned int value)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(attribMap); i++)
- if (attribMap[i].attrib == attrib) {
- driValue = *(unsigned int *) ((char *) mode +
attribMap[i].offset);
- return driValue == value;
- }
+ if (attribMap[i].attrib == attrib) {
+ driValue = *(unsigned int *) ((char *) mode +
attribMap[i].offset);
+ if (driValue == GLX_DONT_CARE)
+ return GL_TRUE;
+
+ return driValue == value;
+ }
return GL_TRUE; /* Is a non-existing attribute equal to value? */
}
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 22:49 +0200, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> Pierre Willenbrock schrieb:
> > Pierre Willenbrock schrieb:
> >> Ben Gamari schrieb:
> >>> Kristian,
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible that your recent commit
> >>> (dc836edf49a08a7fd77fc1f127818b0550558581: Initialize
> >>> GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap attributes correctly.) broke GLX? Since
> >>> today, all GL applications fail to find any visuals. For instance, take
> >>> glxinfo,
> >>>
> >>> ben at mercury /opt/exp/mesa $ glxinfo
> >>> name of display: :0.0
> >>> Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual
> >>>
> >>> visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
> >>> id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> 0x21 24 tc 1 0 0 c . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
> >>> 0x22 24 dc 1 0 0 c . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
> >>> 0x56 32 tc 1 0 0 c . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
> >>>
> >>> I have bisected the problem down to the commit listed above. The problem
> >>> in particular seems to be triggered by the first chunk of the diff
> >>> (enabling some entries in the attribute map). I'm not too familiar with
> >>> the plumbing for glx visuals, but I'll take a quick look at it tonight.
> >>> Otherwise, is it possible that your change could have lead to some
> >>> unexpected (or perhaps expected ;-) ) breakage? Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> - Ben
> >>
> >> i have been suffering from this, too, but recompiling everything from
> >> scratch did not fix this. Searching further, i found that the
> >> attribute __DRI_ATTRIB_YINVERTED has been enabled in the attribute
> >> offset list used to compare with attributes in the DRIconfig struct,
> >> although the needed infrastructure for that attribute is not in place,
> >> leading to failure in all compares.
> >
> > That was a bit too early. Removing that attribute makes only
> > progs/xdemos/glxinfo work. The rest still fails.. Back to the debugger.
> >
>
> The xserver sends no GLX_BIND_TO_TEXTURE_RGB_EXT-tag(and others) for
> visuals, therefore the comparison in driConfigEqual always fails for
> visuals. I think there are two ways to deal with this: either teach
> __glXDisp_GetVisualConfigs to send the missing tags, or teach
> driConfigEqual to ignore variables set to GLX_DONT_CARE.
>
> Indirect rendering mode seems to be unaffected, possibly because the
> visual structs are passed in server as-is(just speculating). Some
> distros seem to always set LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre
> _______________________________________________
> xorg mailing list
> xorg at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
More information about the xorg
mailing list