Current tinderbox regression (xserver/sparc)
daniel at fooishbar.org
Fri Apr 11 01:15:55 PDT 2008
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:03:19AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 15:41 -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> > http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2008-04-09-0027/
> > http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2008-04-09-0027/logs/xserver/#build
> > source='xpstubs.c' object='xpstubs.lo' libtool=yes \
> > DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/bash ../depcomp \
> > -c -o xpstubs.lo xpstubs.c
> > exec: usage: exec [-cl] [-a name] file [redirection ...]
> > ...
> > libtool: link: `xpstubs.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> > (Context: We switched to dolt in place of libtool. It's working on the
> > x86 tinderbox host, and failing on the sparc tinderbox host.)
> dolt isn't actually used on sparc yet, but it looks like the fallback to
> libtool isn't working properly.
I don't even see how it could be dolt:
checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) none
checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3
checking dependency style of $(CC)... (cached) none
This is what causes it to fall back to using depcomp instead of gcc, and
for some reason $(LTCOMPILE) is empty. Ten points for the person who
can explain to me why this is, bearing in mind that LTCOMPILE is only
modified in the if $dolt_supported case, which is plainly not true here.
Chris, any chance you could please tar up the entire build tree
(configure scripts, Makefiles, everything) and put it somewhere for me
to poke at?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the xorg