daniel at fooishbar.org
Thu Aug 7 06:53:17 PDT 2008
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 09:38:35AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 19:23 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 12:09:13PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > There's no new xtrans release with NOXAUTH yet, so if you'd also add a
> > >
> > > #ifndef TRANS_NOXAUTH
> > > #define TRANS_NOXAUTH 0
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > in the appropriate place, then this looks fine for master, and we can
> > > just cull the ifdef once new xtrans goes out.
> > Sorry, but no. Why not just merge and shove an xtrans release out, or
> > just make git xserver depend on git xtrans? Wouldn't be the first time.
> Because it's easy to be polite about build deps so why not just do it.
Point. I'm just over ifdef city. Maybe we need an easily-greppable
(possibly even machine-parseable) string that specifies when we should
remove some ifdefs.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the xorg