[RFC] RandR 1.3 properties, version 2
mhopf at suse.de
Thu Dec 18 05:41:19 PST 2008
On Dec 18, 08 18:34:26 +1100, Graeme Gill wrote:
> Matthias Hopf wrote:
> > AFAIR we agreed on that this property name can just be changed without
> > breaking backward compatibility, because it was never agreed upon that
> > this was a standard so far.
> I guess I can always add yet another EDID atom string check
> to my display color profile management code, but is there a
> reason to change it ?
It conforms to the standard naming scheme we AFAIU agreed on on the
I'd have no issues with adding a non-advocated EDID_DATA again to the
server, if that sounds fit reasonable. Keith?
Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de> __ __ __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ mat at mshopf.de
Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R & D www.mshopf.de
More information about the xorg