RandR 1.3 additions?

[Keith Packard]

On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 23:29 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:

> Hm yeah, sounds interesting.  Seems like a good addition.  So would the server 
> have any visibility into the encoder scheme?  I guess not, though it would 
> probably make sense to have a server provided encoder structure so that the 
> drivers don't have to invent one themselves...

i'm not sure we need any structure at this point, but certainly some
RandR 1.3 documented conventional properties seem necessary. We've
talked about that several times, but no-one has built the canonical list
of standard properties and values.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20080122/5e425397/attachment.pgp>