Intel batchbuffer

Peter Clifton pcjc2 at cam.ac.uk
Sat Jun 21 01:57:37 PDT 2008


On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 21:46 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was wondering what the status of the intel-batchbuffer / DRI2 branch
> is at the moment? It is fairly unstable with the git mesa, and Xorg, and
> there appears to be a reasonable churn between it and the master branch.
> Was the intention to update and merge it at some point, or was it just
> an experiment?
> 
> I've taken a stab at merging the master branch with the batchbuffer
> branch, but hit a huge number of conflicts.
> 
> Is this useful work to continue with? (is the branch still useful?)
> Are there fixes on master, and not in batchbuffer, which might help its
> stability?
> 
> 


I'm surprised I hadn't seen any discussion here or on the mesa list, but
I found some archived emails about batchbuffer being abandoned in favour
of GEM. Never mind.

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)




More information about the xorg mailing list