on deprecating startx/xinit [was: spaces in pathnames]
xsdg at mit.edu
Mon Jun 30 12:09:39 PDT 2008
Adam Jackson wrote:
>> It's practically impossible to get this 100% right if you're limited
>> to the Bourne shell.
> Then maybe it's time to stop caring about portability to useless shells.
> More broadly, it's probably time to deprecate startx and xinit, strongly
> recommend the use of a display manager like gdm, and write a minimal
> replacement in some sensible subset of bash/ksh.
What would this actually mean? I have at least one system that I use
primarily in the console, but which has X on it for those occasions
where I need it. (For instance, if I need to look at an image, or visit
a webpage that doesn't like links2).
How would this mode of use be affected? Given that the machine is low
on memory in the first place, forcing me to run a DM all the time
wouldn't be reasonable. Having to fire up a DM just to run a quick X
session doesn't seem right either.
Keep in mind that I am not fundamentally for or against any particular
architecture for starting X. I only care about how some change might
affect how I use X.
More information about the xorg