Xprt does not play well with D-BUS

[Keith Packard]

On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 22:44 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:

> Let me know if you want more details.  I'm in the mood for a flamewar ;-)

Potentially more timely is that we now have more than one credible API
which draw to both the display and printers, so anyone using X for
printing should feel so embarrassed that they either rewrite their
applications or hide in shame.

It's almost like I've been fighting against Xprt for twenty years. Oh
wait, it's been *more than that*.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20080510/a6ecc8aa/attachment.pgp>