Where is libGLcore.so ?
dbn.lists at gmail.com
Mon May 12 15:39:19 PDT 2008
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Kristian Høgsberg <krh at bitplanet.net> wrote:
> You can't keep them in lock step anyway - do a mesa build and install
> it, then udpate mesa to a incompatible version and do an xserver build
> and they're out of sync even with our current symlink technique. The
> underlying problem is that the glapi interface is part of the DRI
> drivers and if it ever breaks, the DRI driver interface breaks. This
> won't change whether we symlink or not. I don't think it's a big
> deal, but breaking the compile time dependency on mesa source is
> major, in my opinion.
That's why I was suggesting a versioned glapi library built in mesa
that libGL and libglx can link to. Regardless, what you're suggesting
is an improvement. Killing --with-mesa-source would be great.
More information about the xorg